Francis Watson has provided a summary list of the requirements for interpretation found in Augustine’s De doctrina christiana. This list presents an ideal, for even Augustine doesn’t live up to all the points (#5). Cognizant of his own shortcomings, he nevertheless proclaimed a daunting standard. Seminaries today hardly have such high aims.
- A firm grasp of the telos of Holy Scripture and its interpretation, which is to engender the love of the Triune God and of the neighbor and nothing else.
- A personal orientation toward holiness and the fear of God.
- An ability to reach an informed decision about the precise scope of the scriptural canon.
- An intimate familiarity with the entire Bible.
- A knowledge of Hebrew and Greek, to facilitate clearer understanding of authorial intention.
- An expertise in textual criticism, so as to eliminate corruptions of the text.
- A broad acquaintance with secular sciences, especially history and logic.
- An ability to identify and decide between competing exegetical possibilities.
- An awareness of the differences between current social conventions and those of the biblical past.
- An understanding of scriptural tropes and rhetoric.
- A sense of the manifold interpretive possibilities of the biblical text—possibilities intended by the author and/or Holy Spirit, in token of the divine abundance.” (“Authors, Readers, Hermeneutics” in Reading Scripture with the Church, 122)
No, I don’t know why the formatting did that.
Leave a comment